I have a new essay published in Partners in Social Change. It is a publication on behalf of Washington Coalition of Sexual Assault Programs. It begins on page 4. I outline how the media is currently bias in the coverage of Mike Tyson and his rape conviction. In short, only Mike Tyson gets to go on TV and tell his side of the story while Desiree Washington’s version of events is completely absent. Check it out, here.
Here’s an article from CNN. The title says it all: Pakistani newlyweds decapitated by bride’s family in honor killing. When will this stop?
I recently finished Mike Tyson’s book “Undisputed Truth.” The short review is “meh.” I’m all about people having the ability to write their own story, but if you know anything about Tyson, don’t expect anything new. If you don’t know much about Tyson’s career pre-Hangover movies, then it’s worth your time.
Also, the book is nearly 600 pages long. I have no problem reading lengthy books and frequently read books that are well over 600 pages. It is a quick read. However, there were pages and pages of “and then I fought this guy and then I fought that guy” as well as pages and pages of “and then I had sex with this girl and then I had sex with that girl.” Again, if you’ve followed Tyson, most of this stuff will be familiar.
The reason why I read this book is because I’m gearing up to write a 25 page article on Tyson’s return to the public spotlight. Specifically, I’m interested in discussing how Tyson has been afforded the opportunity to recreate his image 20 years after his rape conviction. As an communication scholar, I’m concerned that Tyson is the only one whose voice is being heard in this discussion. Essentially, only his side of the story is being told. Therefore, he can mold the story however he wants. I have a short article (1,000 words) about this coming out in a newsletter later this summer. I’ll post the link to this article once it’s published.